Book Review: Roar



Title: Roar

Author: Cora Carmack

Rating: 1/5 Stars

Series? Yes


Eagle-eyed blog readers may note that the usual purchase links to online retailers is missing from this post. This was entirely intentional because I think every dollar that goes towards Roar is a dollar wasted. I went in expecting an entertaining fantasy, filled with storm magic and a princess discovering her destiny. While the book partially delivered on these expectations, it also came with a significant amount of toxic masculinity, two domineering and possessive love interests, a romance that perpetuates rape culture, and a woman of colour thrown under the bus to further the heroine’s own storyline.


I’ll get the lone positive out of the way first. The world building in Roar was compelling, set in a world haunted by tempestuous storms where gifted humans employ magic to control them. Since the internet has no shortage of glowing reviews about the magic system in Roar, I’ll leave it at that. I have a lot more to say about the toxic romance in Roar as, it is an example of how dangerous it is for harmful tropes to reign unchecked and unchallenged. This post will contain spoilers for the romantic plot within Roar. This is the book that ruins itself, so I am just helping it along.

Note: The protagonist in this book goes by three different names – Aurora, Rora, and Roar – I will use the name Roar for the sake of clarity.

Trigger warning for romanticised abuse.

My main issue with Roar is the very problematic romanticisation of male sexual aggression and possessiveness. Unlike many YA novels where the narration primarily takes place from the heroine’s point of view, Roar is also written from Cassius and Locke’s perspective – and their thoughts on Roar were disturbing and frightening, especially because the text largely presented them as romantic.

Creepy Love Interest #1 – The Tortured Prince

Moments later Cassius Locke melted out of the shadows, looking more like a villain than a prince—dressed all in black with dark hair and eyes to match.

The first love interest is betrothed to Roar. Cassius Locke is your classic dark, sardonic hero, complete with chiselled cheekbones and a secret agenda. Within ten minutes of their first meeting, we have him throwing her over his shoulders – caveman style – because her gorgeous gown was restricting her movement and he simply did not have the patience. Isn’t that charming? This particularly gallant thought also crossed his mind during their first encounter:

…he had a feeling that conquering her would prove more exhilarating than any storm he had ever defeated.

Yes, Cassius, because women are objects meant to be conquered. Also, this is the first of several instances that Roar is compared to a storm under a male’s gaze within this text – and given the misogynistic history surrounding the naming and feminisation of destructive cyclones and hurricanes, these comparisons constantly bothered me. The storms within this particular universe are described as devastating and mesmerising, people simply can’t help but be captivated and destroyed by their unknowable force. To her love interests, Roar is equally magnetic, they can’t help wanting her, it’s her own nature that makes them want to conquer and claim her.

Here’s a couple more examples of Cassius’s simply winning personality:

Her aggression had been a surprising but welcome new morsel of her personality. He had prodded at the fire in her, treated her like a woman he truly wanted, rather than a woman he had to have at any cost.

In this instance, Cassius perceives Roar’s anger as being a come-on rather than a warning that he has overstepped his boundaries (as mentioned above, this is a guy has no concept of what a personal bubble is). According to Cassius, when you’re interested in a woman, you have to ‘prod at her fire’ – because nothing is more romantic than pissing off your wife-to-be.

“You don’t deserve someone like me,” he said… “But you are mine all the same.”

Unfortunately, this is not the last time vile possessive sentiments will be voiced within the book. At least Roar is not impressed at this stage. However, the next time someone else says this, the text will treat it as romantic.

Mercifully, at this point in the novel, Roar does not entertain Cassius’s nonsense – she had the fortitude to think:

She had hoped that when all was said and done, she could finally belong to herself.

Ohhh Roar, I had such high hopes for you. Unfortunately, both our hopes largely go unfulfilled – at least in the romance department (to be honest, there’s not a great deal of plot in this book aside from the romance). Her second love interest is even more consumed with thoughts of possessing her.

Creepy Love Interest #2 – Protective Alpha Hunter

When Locke first appeared, I harboured some hope that the book’s romantic plotline will take a less toxic course. Perhaps Locke was the thoughtful, respectful foil to Cassius’s domineering personality. Alarm bells rang immediately when I saw his first POV perspective of the heroine:

He has been teasing earlier with his little girl comment, but now she did look young. And frightened. And it roused every protective instinct he had.

Right off the bat, we have the overprotective alpha-male trope rearing its ugly head, along with a healthy dose of toxic idealisation of masculinity. Males can’t help but want to protect their love interest, and in this case, the instinct comes with a need for control and possession. It’s a ‘romantic’ set up that we have unfortunately seen time and again, but this is one of the most rage-inducing version of the trope I’ve read in recent years.

To add another layer of creepiness to it all, Roar also reminds him of his dead sister:

But he remembered the feel of his sister, the timbre of her soul, the bravado with which she had lived. Roar had that same strange mix of vulnerability and strength.

In an entire book’s worth of Locke’s conflicting and very unsettling narration on Roar, this is a first. Locke simultaneously equates Roar to the little sister he had failed to protect, while also obsessively thinking of her through a more romantic lens. Here’s a couple of examples:

He had thought about her more today than he cared to admit, wondering what kind of home, if any, she had gone back to. But anything in this city would be safer for her than life in the wildlands.

At first it was kind of sweet, although perplexing as he’s only met Roar a couple of hours ago.

But now after three nights of restless sleep, broken by nightmares about a girl in danger who was somehow both his sister and Roar simultaneously, he had run out of excuses. It had been ages since he’d last had a nightmare. He knew having Roar here would throw him off balance, but it was even worse than he anticipated.

Then he began losing sleep over her and I started side-eyeing a little. Note that all of this obsessive behaviour is always framed as Roar’s fault, because of her nature – he cannot help but be infuriated, mesmerised, and obsessed with her. In Roar (as is sadly true in most romance), this is often painted as something that sets the heroine apart from other women, something that is romantic rather than unsettling.

And when he wasn’t consumed with thoughts of her, he was battered by an anxiety that had never plagued him before.

Obsession is not romance. Locke’s constant preoccupation with Roar eventually manifests in a more physical manner during their training sessions (for context, he’s teaching her how to manipulate and hunt storms). All of their training session sets feminism back by around two decades, but these passages are the ones that made me physically ill:

He should let her go. He knew her well enough now to know that manhandling her would only make her fight harder. But he was too distracted by the way her body fit against his own. Her soft hair tickled his neck. Even more startling, she had stopped fighting him completely. Her body sank against his, her back pressed against his chest and abdomen. He became acutely aware of where his arms wrapped around her shoulders and her midsection. She sucked in a breath, and the rise and fall of her chest moved through both of them.

Firstly, I do not think anyone of any gender would respond well to being manhandled. Secondly, his display of physical dominance followed by his sexual arousal truly makes me want to hurl. It is passages like these that are potentially triggering for survivors of sexual assault. I think it is absolutely vile that Locke even made it off the editing table. When I read paragraphs like this one, I feel like I am seeing through the eyes of an abuser – one that blames women for being distracting and inviting with their “soft hair” and curves. There is nothing remotely romantic about this predatory behaviour. This is abuse, and I cannot brush it off as a bad alpha-male trope – especially given how many reviewers view this as romantic.

Locke then follows up this assault with thinking:

He knew he should step away, but it was like he’d been mesmerized. He stood there, stock-still, his mind filled with nothing but her. If she were a storm, she could destroy him, and he would never lift a finger to protect himself.

Locke, you sack of waste, she is not a danger to you. Quite the opposite, you’re the clear aggressor in this situation. You do NOT get to blame her for mesmerising you, not when you clearly can’t control your own revolting impulses to dominate her. Society keeps making excuses for men like Locke, and seeing echoes of these excuses in fiction – especially ones that defend his action in the name of romance –  make me see red.

As if this assault was not bad enough, within the same chapter, Locke then proceeds to start groping Roar. The passage is far too long for me to quote here, but it includes ‘he stilled and looked at her like hunters looked at prey’, and ‘the hand around her neck tightened’. Also, there is this very awful passage which reduces a woman’s body into an object to be conquered:

She was uncharted territory, and mountains formed where he touched her and a river of sensation flowed down her spine.’

The fact that this takes place from Roar’s perspective makes it all the more disheartening and disturbing. By the time Locke’s wandering hand started ‘grazing the upper curve of her bottom’, she begins to question ‘Why?’. Why was he putting his hands all over her without clear consent? The answer, dear reader, truly establishes what we already know – Locke is trash:

“When you’re distracted or feeling strong emotions, the natural barriers of your mind are weaker and more susceptible to being mesmerized by a storm’s magic. Which means something as simple as a thick fog could do much worse than make you forget where you are or what you were doing. It could keep you in the fog, even as it moves, dragging you along with it. Your mental barriers must be without weakness.”

He claims this particular assault was done in the name of training, to strengthen her mental barrier. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry or rage at this point. Of course, there are no consequences for Locke. It’s heartbreaking to see Roar turn the anger she feels towards herself instead – for not being able to see through his manipulation. She does this on a couple of occasions:

Locke’s voice was a fierce, angry growl, and she bowed up, ready to growl right back. She was getting tired of his moods—suffocatingly protective one second and a beast the next.

While Roar does occasionally acknowledge that Locke’s behaviour is tiresome, the text never probes further. His action is portrayed as a minor annoyance and a character quirk – rather than extremely harmful and toxic. Roar only pushes back enough for Locke to see her as a challenge to be conquered, and she never manages to get him to respect her personal boundaries. In one scene, she shares a horse with Locke and tries her best to avoid bodily contact—this is what our romantic hero proceeds to do:

After the tenth or so time she had tried and failed to keep from falling against him, he was out of patience. Wrapping the reins once around the pommel so he didn’t lose them, he reached both hands back to grip her thighs, well above her burns, and tugged her forward. She squeaked in response, her fingers tangling in the leather straps and holsters that crossed his abdomen. He would be lying if he didn’t admit that he got pleasure out of both her outraged cry and the feel of her surrounding him. “There,” he said, his voice low so that only she could hear. “We’re touching. I can feel you, all soft and warm against my back.” He heard her sharp intake of breath behind him, and he could swear her fingers tightened on the holster around his midsection. “You can feel me, and the world has not descended into flame again.” Though there was plenty of heat moving down his spine.

Because when a woman is clearly establishing boundaries, what you should do is force her into compromising position and tell yourself that she enjoys it? Roar rightly calls him ”such an ass!” after this particular exchange, and this is his smug response:

Yes, but I’m an ass who gets what he wants.” He hadn’t meant those words to sound quite so possessive. He still thought it was a bad idea to get attached to her, but since the kiss, he was having trouble getting himself to care.

The book is aware that Locke is an overly-possessive alpha male – yet it is continually treated as something that’s attractive. This would be problematic no matter which audience the book was published for, but Roar is specifically marketed to the YA audience and this makes it all the more abhorrent. Teens are partially informed about the world around them by the media they consume. Having the primary love interest constantly pushing the heroine’s personal boundaries and dismissing her protests is harmful and irresponsible. By the way, that kiss he mentions in the paragraph above also unsurprisingly transpires without consent:

“Would you listen—”
“Can you just leave me alone?” His hand seized her elbow, and he spun her around forcefully. He growled, “No. I can’t.”
And then his mouth collided with hers. For a moment, Roar did not understand what was happening. She knew his lips were on hers, pushing hard enough to be punishment, and his fingers threaded through her hair, and an arm wrapped tight around her waist. But even knowing those things, she could not quite comprehend that Locke was kissing her. She froze, unsure whether she wanted to allow it or shove him away. She had been so angry, but now that blazing heat had melted into something different, like molten glass being shaped into something new. He tilted her head back, his hand gripping tighter in her hair, and when he opened his mouth against hers, she followed. He kissed his own fury into her, melting and reshaping her again and again with each strokes of his tongue over hers.

I nearly threw my Kindle across the room at this point in the book. Roar really knows how to get these romances burning, because haven’t we all dreamed of being shut up with a kiss – especially one that was akin to “punishment”? After all, isn’t that what we deserve for defying the alpha male’s unquestionable authority? Especially because we seem to enjoy the kiss so much? There are so many layers of wrong to this passage that I cannot unpack them all.

Roar does push back a little after this kiss, telling Locke he ‘cannot manipulate [her] into letting go of [her] anger’. Yet the book quickly diminishes this display of backbone by i) having Locke spout the age-old excuse ‘I was worried, and I overreacted.’, and ii) we have to end this particular assault with her thought on how the ‘kiss [was] so intense that she was still shaking’.

The book makes excuses for Locke time and again, and Roar is too distracted by her physical attraction to him to ever truly challenge him. While I wish I could say the book did this with the intention of subverting the trope, and I continued reading Roar with that hope in mind – I truly believe that the readers are meant to think of this as romantic. The PR campaign around this book is all about picking your book-crushes, not about confronting your abuser. Given the amount of reviews saying how ‘swoon-worthy’ or ‘steamy’ the romance is, I am truly disheartened. I am angry at how easy it is to dismiss these toxic tropes and for the world to make excuses for (or even overlook) abuse.

How do I know that the book has no intention of redeeming itself and will paint Locke as a romantic figure to the bitter end? Because this is the culmination of Locke and Roar’s relationship, and it’s definitely meant to be viewed in a positive light. In classic Locke manner, all romantic interactions are drenched with language that’s intended to dominate and control:

…suddenly he was thinking about kissing her again, tugging her down until their mouths crashed together. Would she yell at him or kiss him back?

Blog readers – if there’s ever a possibility that a woman might yell at you when you kiss her – DON’T DO IT. Actually, don’t kiss anyone without their consent. It’s frightening that the thoughts Locke has about Roar often forgo consent.

He had lost control over his own hand, and it trailed up and down her back now, tracing the delicate line of her spine again and again. And with each pass, he claimed a little more of her…

And of course, even when he has consent to touch her – he uses words that imply he has no choice in the matter. He can’t help but want to claim her like she’s some trophy to be had. Locke, I would have a tiny measure of respect for you if you would just own up to your own action and obsession instead of blaming your lust for Roar on male instinct.

Locke couldn’t stop the fierce protectiveness that rose in him, and before he knew what he was doing, he had caught her face in his hands, turning it toward him. “Who was he? The man from the market?”

Hey, book, I am getting really sick of this. Abandoning logic, reason, and consideration for the other party because you ‘love’ them so much is not romantic. There is always a choice, and pretending there is not is the classic tactic of an abuser. This kind of protectiveness is just a few steps away from actual violence, whether it’s towards perceived threats or the actual person you’re meant to be protecting. How many times have we seen domestic abuse in real life being explained away with these same excuses? ‘I couldn’t help myself.’ ‘I lost control.’ ‘She made me.’ Book, please make Locke take some goddamn responsibility for his atrocious behaviour.

“I’m the first to touch this mouth? To taste it?” Her nails dug into his shoulders, and her blue eyes flashed with heat. She nodded, her tongue darting out to soothe the skin he had tugged between his teeth. “That means it’s mine. My territory. And I’m prepared to protect it, every hour of the day if I must.”

What ever happened to ‘not wanting to sound possessive’, Locke? A woman’s body is not anyone’s property. For a book that began as a journey for Aurora’s independence, seeing her reduced in the eye of her lover to an object to be conquered is truly devastating. On a larger scale, seeing Roar marketed as a fantasy book with female empowerment, it’s distressing to see how wide it missed the mark when it came to romance.

The Forgotten Woman of Colour

Nova, one of Roar’s maids and her childhood friend, is the one character I enjoyed within this book. She’s a woman of colour (unspecified in that vague fantasy race fashion, did you expect any more from this awful book). She also has anxiety disorder that was portrayed with some measure of authenticity (according to promotional post, this book is #ownvoices for the anxiety disorder).

She might have been born with magic same as Aurora, but long ago, her kind of magic had been deemed dirty, evil even. After all, it was people like her that caused the Time of Tempests

Of course, unlike our heroine who’s a princess with undiscovered potential and power – Nova has ‘dirty’ magic – in fact, her entire people have dirty magic. It is never really challenged within the text aside from hints that the entire Stormling construct is corrupt.

Using her past friendship with Nova, Roar convinces Nova to help her escape the palace. The power imbalance between the two already makes me uncomfortable, but the fact that Roar would put Nova into harm’s way, knowing of the royal family’s dark intentions, makes me hate her a little.

Then the book proceeds to forget that Nova exists. Occasionally checking in on her to i) show us Cassius’s manly posturing as he abuses Nova to get information about Roar, and ii) to undoubtedly use her to advance the plot within the next novel. People of colour are not set pieces, but in a book so enchanted with its lily-white heroine and her abusive love interest – I am not really surprised.

I am disappointed that in 2017, we still have books where male sexual aggression is rewarded, where abuse is romanticised, and where readers will happily accept it as ‘cheesy tropes’. We owe it to ourselves to hold the YA genre to a higher standard. Words have power, and I personally do not want to see that power go towards excusing the toxic behaviour of alpha males.

Thank you so much to Jananee of Head In Her Books and Sofia of The Literary Casanova for helping me proofread this post. They both have brilliant blogs that you should check out. All remaining mistakes are solely my fault.


46 thoughts on “Book Review: Roar

  1. The promo campaign for this book was great and had me hyped to read it but this WHOLE thing ughh and I was annoyed with ACOWAR saying “my mate” this guy takes it to another level, that kiss scene is gross. As much as I was excited for the world building I was expecting a kickass storm powered female centered story not some possessive males crossing so many boundaries, I’ll read Twilight if I want that.

    Great review An ❤

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Locke makes Tamlin look perfectly gentlemanly by comparison. I am still pressed he shares name with other awesome Lockes.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. You’re right. It is just so frustrating to still have books like this around. And so many of them! I don’t understand why people would like unhealthy nonsense like this.


    1. Thank you, Lissa! A couple of reviewers I normally trusted gave this very high rating, which I why I bought a copy. I guess it’s just very easy to brush Locke off as an annoying alpha male rather than anything harmful.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Whoa, what a very good, very detailed review, Aentee! Love reading reviews like yours! Now I’m totally swayed not to get this book! Looks very problematic, sexist and just plain creepy (?). And ugh, totally agree that obsession is never romantic and should never be romanticised. 😦 Why are we still seeing books like this?!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you so much, Kat! The sheer misogyny in a book that’s meant to promote female empowerment is truly laughable. It’s 2017, I can’t believe I’m still complaining about alpha males in fiction like it’s the Twilight era.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. This is a really well-done post, Aentee. I think there’s a really, REALLY fine line between being protective of a woman, and being controlling and abusive. (I also think that line will inevitably be different for everyone, you know?) Unfortunately, YA seems to cross that line all too often these days, and worse still, I think that there are women who *do* find that behaviour attractive (simply because it’s been romanticised in books and whatnot — not that I’m intentionally trying to shame a woman’s sexual preferences or anything here.) Great post!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. As much as I’d love to dismiss these tropes as guilty pleasure, I think it is too much of a blurred line — especially when there are people who reads about Locke’s manhandling and forced kisses and think “that’s romantic”. It reinforces the subconscious societal thinking that even when a woman says “No”, she doesn’t really mean it. Personally I can’t get over that. Thanks for reading!


  4. The sad thing is I have seen so many of these types of romances in books. And the even sadder thing is when I was a lot younger, I thought it was normal to see this. Books like these disgust me for making 13 year old me believe being shut up with a kiss was romantic BECAUSE IT’S NOT. I am so so glad you wrote their review and warned me against this because while I didn’t have any plans on reading this I definitely know now I am not going to bother.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad so much of YA has healthy relationships now. This book came out of nowhere and is a discredit to YA books everywhere. And yesss! That’s what I’m most unsettled by, that we see these sorta thing and think “that’s normal, that’s ok, that’s romantic” — because some of that sort of thinking is bound to bleed over to real life. Words have power, damn it.


  5. Thanks so much for writing this fab review Aentee, because as you know I did let the abusive romance slide while reading (and reviewing!). For me, reading so much NA/adult romances has almost normalized these protective, Alpha male love interests to an extent – in fiction at least. But like you said, words have power and it’s in the author’s hands to make sure unhealthy relationships don’t become romanticized. This is especially critical in YA since it’s such a life-changing time of our lives.

    Do you mind if I link to this on my GR? I want more reviewers to be aware of this before starting.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. I was reading your tweets of this book yesterday and I’m so happy you went into more detail with your review. I’ve seen this book hyped up so much, and the good thing is, it was never on my radar.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. I’ve never heard of this book, but I know the author has written several NA books and since me and NA don’t click, I have no interest in reading it. Honestly, it sounds even worse than what I expected. NA is pretty much saturated with alpha male trope, but this book really crosses the line. And if what you said about the glowing reviews are true, I can’t believe people actually missed these assaults and toxic romance! Yeah I agree, it’s 2017 and it’s sad how we still have to deal with this kind of trope.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I heard the author’s NA books are actually pretty good and none of this stuff occur there. Her fans are shocked at these passages too, maybe she will do an ACOTAR and subvert these tropes in the sequel? But the damage is done for me, I’m not interested in future novels.


  8. Jfc…What the hell? I love Cora’s Rusk University series, because that one has pretty decent representation, deals with the trauma of sexual assault and emphasizes female relationships and empowerment. So what the fuck happened here?
    Thank you so much for taking the time to break this clusterfuck down and for warning people against this toxic bullshit. It’s so important that we acknowledge the toxic romance and abuse in literature, and you pulled this off fantastically! Snaps and props to you, love!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’ve heard from the author’s other fans that her NA books are very good, so I was surprised to see everything go so wrong here. Maybe she will have Roar subvert these tropes in the sequel? Not holding my breath though considering how the book ended with her cuddling up to Locke.


  9. Holy crap. This certainly is a storm, of a four-letter variety. I didn’t have any interest in reading this anyway because the second I came across her marriage arrangement to “a dark and brooding prince” in the summary, I swerved. Hard pass.

    Now I am so glad that I did. I genuinely shuddered reading some of these excerpts. I agree with your parting sentiment–how does this crap still get published? It’s disgusting.

    Wonderfully well written post! Thanks so much for sharing!


  10. Thank you so much for this!! I was really looking forward to Roar (the concept sounds so cool!), but I can’t stomach romanticized abuse in the slightest. I’ll be sure to avoid it and spare myself the queasiness.


  11. Yikes. I had such high hopes for the book and the hype surrounding it made it sound amazing but I am so happy I’ve dodged a bullet with this book. I have a zero tolerance policy when it comes to romanticising abusive relationships. Thank you for highlighting the problematic nature of this book!!


  12. Ew gross. This book sounds disgusting. I couldn’t even read all the examples you set out they’re so awful. And really, POC still being props? get your act together people. I was low-key excited for this one, but I’ve taken it off my list to read and I’m glad I never picked it up. Great review and thanks for being a smart reader.


  13. This is the worst review (good review worst book) I have read this year. Oh my God! The passages you have quoted! The manhandling part reads like rape itself. Sorry you had to spend your time on this. Btw the comment about bloggers censoring stuff by not including purchase links was hilarious. I mean, who writes that for a comment? It does not even make sense.


  14. Just reading this review made me so angry. I can’t believe you made it through the whole book! I will never understand how this horrible, dangerous idea of “romance” is still being perpetuated these days. ESPECIALLY for a young audience, as you mentioned. I mean, I guess there’s a niche for erotica like this, and that’s fine if the readers are adults and aware of what they’re reading (I still don’t understand the appeal, but somehow 50 Shades of Gray is popular), but it should not be promoted to teens as acceptable, sexy, or something to strive for or tolerate in their own love lives.


  15. Ew – male sexual aggression is rewarded, where abuse is romanticised, and where readers will happily accept it as ‘cheesy tropes’ – no, thank you! I’d seen the promo going on, but will be staying far away now that I know it’s such a mess. I’d love to see a post about books that get consent right.


  16. This is the first I’m hearing of it. I’m SO disappointed no one raised the flag before this. Reminds me of Promise of Fire, that was everywhere and hyped, and it wasn’t until it was too late that I learned of the “romance” issues.

    I’ve updated and taken off my TBR. Thanks for the heads up and slogging through all of that. Take care of yourself!


  17. This was such a fantastic review, I really enjoyed reading it.
    Do you think the reason Carmack relied on these heavily trope-y/toxic masculine characters is because she is originally a New Adult author? That’s not an excuse on the author’s part, but an observation. We all know how harmful NA can be with its constant use of “protective alphas” and other toxic examples of masculinity, so maybe she was unconsciously subverting that NA (I had using this word) trope into her YA series? If that’s the case, the editor really should have pulled the author up on this. For goodness sake, this is 2017 now, YA fiction has developed so much from the ‘Twilight’ days where female characters were treated like objects. Disappointing.
    I might read Roar eventually, to see if my experience will match up with yours, but I’m not in a hurry to put it at the top of my tbr. Thanks for a very honest review!


  18. I received this book in a fairy loot box and was excited since I figured there’d be some care that went into choosing proper books that don’t pedal toxic masculinity. I began reading it, and I have to say that my eyes rolled all the way to Mars every single time Cassius and Locke made some almost hilariously overdramatic comment about wanting to protect and have this precious petal. I stopped reading it out of pure boredom and exasperation at their behaviour, and I clearly didn’t hit the point in the book where Locke began to exhibit such disgusting behaviour. I attributed Cassius’ to his villainy, and saw hope in Roar’s aversion to him as soon as she figured out his plan, but apparently I was too hopeful. I’m glad I read this review so I don’t have to waste my time on such pointless trash. I’d want to give this book away to get rid of it, but I feel like that’s just a way to ensure that more people have their hands on a copy, and a risk of someone seeing this as normal.


  19. Hey, just now discovered this review because I wrote one for my blog. I’m so glad that someone not only picked up on the same warning flags that occurred for me while reading this book, but really took time to explain in detail with accompanying excerpts what the problems were. I applaud you.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s